Part 1 – Background statement
Our committee is focused on ensuring that the remuneration structures at Datatec drive value creation for our stakeholders, with a reward framework and value proposition for our executives, which is in accordance with ethical corporate governance standards.
Deepa Sita
Remuneration Committee Chair
Introduction
On behalf of the Board of directors and the Remuneration Committee, I am pleased to present the remuneration report (“the report”) for 2025.
The Remuneration Committee aims to ensure that Datatec remunerates fairly, responsibly and transparently to promote the achievement of strategic objectives and positive outcomes in the short, medium and long term (King IV Principle 14). Our committee is focused on ensuring that the remuneration structures at Datatec drive value creation for our stakeholders, with a reward framework and value proposition for our executives, which is in accordance with ethical corporate governance standards.
Linking pay to our strategy
Datatec has a comprehensive Strategic Review underway to consider options and initiatives to unlock and maximise shareholder value. The Strategic Review aims to address the persistent gap between Datatec's valuation and the inherent value of its underlying assets, while also ensuring that the Group is positioned to take full advantage of the positive market dynamics for its technology solutions and services.
In parallel, the strategy of pursuing a combination of corporate and business actions aimed at enhancing the competitiveness and profitability of our subsidiaries and operating divisions in order to enhance value remains in place.
Our remuneration policy, set out in part 2 of this report, is aligned our strategic imperatives to drive shareholder value creation.
FY25 performance and remuneration outcomes
The Group delivered excellent operational and financial performance in FY25, with Westcon International and Logicalis International both recording strong results. Logicalis Latin America has undergone a restructuring to address changing market conditions and is starting to see improvements.
The main remuneration outcomes in FY25 are as follows, set out in detail in the Implementation section in Part 3 of this report:
- Executives received a 3% increase in basic pay for FY25;
- Likewise, NED fees were increased by 3% and, during the year, a benchmarking exercise was undertaken to provide assurance that the fee levels are appropriate.
- Short-term incentives (“STI”) earned for FY25 were higher compared to FY24, primarily as a result of improved performance on the corporate goals;
- The Conditional Share Plan (“CSP”) awards granted in July 2022, with a performance period that ended 28 February 2025, vested at 100%, because total shareholder return (“TSR”) and underlying earnings per share (“uEPS”) growth target performance conditions were achieved;
- Overall long-term incentives (“LTI”) for the Datatec executives in FY25 was comparable to the previous year.
These outcomes reflect the continuing improvement in the Group's performance.
Performance and pay targets for FY26
The main remuneration targets and outlook are summarised below, set out in detail in the Implementation section in part 3 of this report:
- Executives received a 3% increase in basic pay for FY26;
- Likewise, a 3% increase in NED fees for FY26 is proposed subject to shareholder approval at the AGM;
- STI – the structure of the FY26 STI plan has been changed slightly from FY25, following consultation with shareholders. The weightings of the individual metrics have changed to increase the personal KPI weighting of executives aimed at closing the valuation gap in alignment with the aims of the Group's strategic review;
- LTI
- CSP awards will be made in line with our policy – the absolute TSR performance condition will be the sole performance condition for the grant in June 2025.
- Deferred bonus warrants (“DBW”) grants of SARs will be made in June 2025 as co-investment with participants' acquisition of shares with part of their FY25 STI.
Aligning remuneration to our strategic objectives
Strategic objective
Value generation
Underlying earnings per share
Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation (“EBITDA”)
Other quantitative measures addressing current short-term priorities
Short-term incentive
Personal KPI for the executive directors' STI: reduce structural discount
Target for 35% of STI is budget uEPS
Target for FY25 30% and FY26 25% of STI is budget Group Adjusted EBITDA
Metrics addressing Westcon International, Logicalis International and Logicalis LATAM working capital.
Long-term incentive
The performance condition for the whole of the CSP vesting is absolute TSR.
Furthermore, executive share ownership requirements and the additional two-year holding period post vesting for DBW, ensure shareholder alignment over the long term.
FY24 and FY25 – DBW co-investment in the form of SARs only benefits participant if share price increases.
–
–
–
The context in which the committee has set STI and LTI targets for FY26 flows from the strategic imperatives of the Group.
The committee believes the use of absolute TSR as a performance condition for CSP vesting will align remuneration with value creation for shareholders, and hence, decided to use this metric as the sole performance condition for CSP grants.
Motivating the drive to improve profitability remains of high importance. Therefore, the uEPS and EBITDA growth targets are key in the STI. The committee has noted that the key metric used by investors for valuing businesses in our sector is EBITDA, and hence, this metric links directly to the strategic goals.
The Remuneration Committee is satisfied that the remuneration policy has achieved its
objectives in FY25, and we propose no material changes to the policy for FY26.
We
believe the policy and implementation set out in this report achieve an equitable
alignment of shareholder and management interests.
Remuneration Committee constitution and operation
The role of the Committee is to assist the Board in ensuring that the Company remunerates directors and executives fairly and responsibly in alignment with the creation of long-term shareholder value and to ensure that the disclosure of director and senior management remuneration is accurate, complete and transparent. The Remuneration Committee operates in line with its charter, which has been approved by the Board.
The Remuneration Committee charter is available at www.datatec.com.
The Remuneration Committee comprises the following independent non-executive directors:
- Deepa Sita (Chair)
- Maya Makanjee
- Luis Rapparini
During FY25, Stephen Davidson also sat on the committee, until his retirement as a non-executive director in July 2024.
The Remuneration Committee's meetings during FY25 and to the date of this report (together with the attendance of the committee members) are shown in the table below:
| 13
March 2024 |
22 May
2024 |
10 July 2024 |
22
October 2024 |
19 March 2025 |
21 May 2025 |
||
| DS Sita | P | P | P | P | P | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M Makanjee | P | P | P | P | P | P | |
| LC Rapparini | P | P | P | P | P | P | |
| SJ Davidson (retired from Board 31 July 2024) | P | A | P | – | – | – | |
| P | = | present |
| A | = | absent |
| – | = | not a member at the time |
The CEO and CFO may be invited to attend segments of meetings of the Remuneration Committee, but neither may take part in any decisions regarding their own remuneration.
The Remuneration Committee employs the services of specialist consultants in the field of executive remuneration to provide advice. The independent service providers used to value LTIs are: ShareForce, BDO and Deloitte. Benchmarking services are provided by Deloitte and Willis Towers Watson. The Committee is satisfied that the consultants have provided independent and objective advice and, while giving due consideration to any advice received, has made its decisions independently in accordance with its charter.
The committee is assisted in its work by the Datatec Group Chief People Officer, Dina Knight, who attends committee meetings by invitation.
The committee reviews its performance annually by means of questionnaires completed by individual committee members, which are then discussed at committee and Board meetings. These appraisals enable the committee to evaluate its effectiveness objectively and to conclude whether it is meeting its objectives as described in its charter. In FY24, Heidrick & Struggles undertook a Board effectiveness review for the Datatec Board and committees which brought an external perspective to the committee's self-assessment.
Focus areas
The committee will continue to focus its oversight on fair and responsible pay and work to ensure the implementation of pay gap reporting in line with Companies Act specifications once promulgated.
Shareholder engagement
We appreciate the strong shareholder support for our remuneration policy and implementation at the 2024 AGM. In January 2025, our annual shareholder engagement helped inform our approach as summarised below.
At the AGM on 31 July 2025, shareholders will be asked to approve our remuneration policy and the implementation report.
We remain committed to ongoing dialogue and value your continued feedback and support.
DS Sita
Chair, Remuneration Committee
May 2025
Shareholder engagement
The Remuneration Committee maintains a programme of shareholder consultation to ensure shareholders' views on remuneration are considered in the Group's remuneration policy and implementation practices.
Voting outcomes
The FY24 remuneration policy was put before shareholders for an advisory vote at the AGM on 31 July 2024 and received support from 95.7% of shares voted (2023: 93.7%).
The FY24 remuneration implementation report was put before shareholders for an advisory vote at the AGM on 31 July 2024 and received support from 96.0% of shares voted (2023: 84.7%).
If the remuneration policy or remuneration implementation is voted against by more than 25% of shareholders, a comprehensive consultation must be undertaken with shareholders in accordance with the King Code and the JSE Listings Requirements.
Consultation during FY25
In-person consultations were held with investment managers in January 2025 with Maya Makanjee, Chair of the Board and Deepa Sita, Chair of the Remuneration Committee.
Discussion point
Short-term incentives
The committee outlined its intention to increase the weighting of the executives' personal KPI to address the structural discount in the share price, also referred to as the valuation gap. Several options for weightings of the STI metrics were shared to prompt discussion with shareholders.
A proposed quantitative measure for the valuation gap for FY26 was discussed, highlighting that share price growth should broadly align with earnings growth over the financial year.
Long-term incentives
No changes were proposed to the LTIs.
Pay gap reporting
Proposals and forthcoming Companies Act amendments relating to pay gap reporting were discussed, with confirmation that the Company is prepared to disclose the required information once implementation dates are finalised
Benchmarking of NED fees
The committee Chair reported that a benchmarking exercise had been carried out, comparing NED fees with a peer group, which indicated fees are in line with international norms.
Shareholders' views
Shareholders were supportive of the increased weighting proposed for the valuation gap metric. While views differed on changes to the weighting of the other STI metrics, a general consensus emerged during the discussions.
There was a broad agreement that KPIs should be defined using clear, quantitative measures.
Shareholders appreciate that TSR is the appropriate performance condition for the CSP in line with the goals of the strategic review.
The two-year holding period applicable to the DBW is also appreciated.
Shareholders understood that the data will cover all South African employees of the Group (in Datatec Head Office, Westcon and Logicalis South African operations). In addition, the remuneration of the CEO and CFO, as executive directors, will be included recognising their international remit.
Shareholders welcomed the external benchmarking exercise, and no concerns were raised about the level of NED fees.
Actions taken
The FY26 STI structure, as set out in the implementation report on FY26 STI structure, reflects the outcomes of this consultation. Further detail of the rationale and the methodology for measuring the STI metrics is also provided in the implementation report.
![]()
The LTI grants for FY26 are planned to be under the same terms as FY25.
Further information on fair and responsible pay is given in the policy
available here.![]()
More detail on the benchmarking exercise is provided in the implementation report
here.
Other matters discussed with shareholders
Other topics discussed included the implementation of the South African Companies Act amendments and their potential impact on remuneration committees and reporting of remuneration.
Shareholders and the committee both value the consultation process which has been maintained for a number of years now and will continue with further engagement in the next financial year.
Part 2 – Remuneration policy
Objectives of the policy
The objectives of the remuneration policy are to:
Set remuneration levels to attract and retain top local and international talent to drive business performance.
Recognise and reward superior performance when it is delivered.
Align employee efforts with key business goals and strategic priorities.
Align employees' and shareholders' interests. To support long-term value creation.
Align employees' remuneration with the goals and outcomes of the Strategic Review.
To achieve these objectives, Datatec applies this remuneration policy to align its executives and managers with the Group's strategic goals and reward them in a manner that reflects market dynamics and the operational context. The Group actively manages its principal divisions, Westcon International, Logicalis International and Logicalis Latin America and applies the remuneration policy throughout the Group.
The policy section of this report provides a high-level overview of the remuneration framework and design principles applicable to all employees, with a focus on Datatec executives.
The implementation section of this report provides detailed disclosures relating to the Datatec executive directors.
Key principles
Key principles of the remuneration policy are to:
Reward all employees appropriately for their contribution to the Group's operating and financial performance.
Apply fair and responsible pay practices consistently to all employees across the Group.
Foster a shared sense of purpose with shareholders.
Consider the international ICT industry, market and country benchmarks to ensure the Group's remuneration remains competitive in key regions in which the Group operates, particularly the US, Brazil and the UK.
Ensure that a significant proportion of executive director and senior manager remuneration is performance-based.
Balance the performance-based remuneration between the achievement of short-term results and long-term strategic objectives.
Fair and responsible pay
The Group remains committed to transparent gender pay reporting as part of its broader focus on fairness, inclusion, and accountability. We will continue to prepare for forthcoming legislative changes and ensure that disclosures are clear comprehensive, and aligned with shareholder expectations. Remuneration is structured around three core components: Including, base salary and benefits, short-term and long-term incentives. Each is designed to align with Datatec's strategic objectives.
Aligning remuneration to our strategic objectives
Strategic objective
Description and policy
Base salary and benefits, including retirement and medical scheme contributions.
Eligibility
All employees
Short-term incentive
Annual bonus plan with performance targets, subject to deferral as explained below.
Group executives participate in an annual STI plan. Divisional management participate in STI plans aligned to divisional and personal targets. Non‑management employees typically receive lower levels of STIs based more on personal targets rather than on corporate goals.
Long-term incentive
Share-based remuneration plans with performance targets. Two share-settled Group plans are used, namely:
- CSP – a performance share plan; and
- DBW – a portion of the bonus is deferred and used to acquire shares, and the Company contributes a co-investment in the form of share appreciation rights (“SARs”). Both of these elements are forfeitable - see structural overview of LTI later in this section.
A number of cash-settled share-based remuneration plans are operated in divisions. These are explained in further detail below.
Management incentive plans (“MIPs”) were introduced for senior management of Westcon International and Logicalis International in FY24. A MIP was introduced for the senior management of the Mason Advisory business in early FY25.
Datatec Group executives and select management participate in the Datatec CSP.
Executive directors and two other senior managers participate in the DBW.
Senior management of Westcon International and Logicalis International participate in their divisional MIPs.
The second tier of senior management in Westcon International and Logicalis International participate in SARs programmes. The senior management of Logicalis Latin America has a similar two-tier structure of LTI which is under review in FY25.
Base salary
The purpose of the base salary is to provide a fixed income to individuals, which is subject to annual review by the Remuneration Committee. In addition to this, executive directors and senior executives are entitled to various employment benefits, such as defined contribution pension, medical insurance, and death and disability insurance. These benefits are determined by the level of base salary received by the executive.
To ensure that the base salary levels for executives are fair and competitive, the Company conducts benchmarking exercises using databases of pay levels in comparator companies, provided by third-party advisers. The comparator companies used are appropriate for the role being benchmarked. As an example, the role of a regional CEO in a subsidiary division is benchmarked against subsidiaries of international groups in that region, while divisional CEOs are benchmarked against international corporations.
During these benchmarking exercises, the median pay of the comparator group is used as a guide for determining the pay of the executive concerned. These exercises are typically conducted when executive roles change or new appointments are made and when internal corporate restructuring is undertaken. While routine annual benchmarking is not automatic, the Remuneration Committee conducts reviews when there are material changes in role, scope, or market conditions to ensure fairness and competitiveness without contributing to upward pay pressure.
Short-term incentive
Structural overview:
| Bonus formula | The STI is calculated as a percentage of base salary and is determined by a weighted score of personal and corporate performance using the following formula: Base salary x On-Target STI percentage x [(personal score x personal weighting) + (corporate score x corporate weighting)] | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-target STI percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
| CEO: 175% | |||||||||||||||||||
| CFO: 95% | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Potential outcomes for the STI in relation to base salary are illustrated in the scenario analysis. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Weightings between corporate and personal performance measures | The weighting between corporate
and personal performance is reflective of the participants' seniority and the
following weightings apply:
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Target setting |
Each element of the bonus is based on the achievement of a target: if that target is reached the bonus element is described as “on-target”. The Remuneration Committee establishes the target and a range around the target demarcated by guard-rails, such that the bonus for each element is capped if the upper guard-rail is reached. Below the lower guard-rail, zero bonus is earned and at the lower guard-rail 40% of on-target bonus is earned. Between the guard-rails and the on-target position the bonus outcome is obtained by linear interpolation. The on-target bonus levels in relation to base salary for the executive directors are set out in the table below. |
||||||||||||||||||
STI as a percentage of base salary
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
The metrics used and STI outcomes for FY25 are shown in the implementation report. Potential outcomes for FY26 STI in relation to base salary are illustrated in the scenario analysis. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Delivery of the STI (applicable to executive directors and senior Group executives) | The STI is partly delivered in cash and partly in shares, which are deferred into the DBW plan with minimum of 20% of the STI is deferred into shares when STI achievement exceeds 50% of target, No deferral applies if STI is below this threshold. | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term incentive
Group plans – structural overview:
| Deferred bonus warrants | Conditional share plan | ||
| Instrument | The deferred STI is in the form of shares, which will be held in escrow for the benefit of participants. The Company co-investment is awarded as SARs. The SARs will be awarded at market value using the same price applicable to purchase the deferred shares. | Conditional rights to shares are subject to performance vesting conditions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | Executive directors (CEO and CFO) and two senior Group executives, provided the minimum STI levels are achieved as indicated above | Executive directors, Group executives and staff | |
| Allocation levels | The mandatory deferral percentage
in the DBW (if the bonus exceeds 50% of target) is 20%.
The maximum deferral percentage is 50%. The number of SARs to be awarded is based on an actuarial calculation of their value relative to the current share price. |
The quantum of awards is based on annual base
salary and the face value of awards, which is the current Datatec share price
(using a 30-day volume-weighted average price) as follows:
|
|
| Performance period | One year, aligned with the STI performance, as explained above. Hence, the performance period is the financial year ending prior to the grant date. | Three years (aligned with the vesting period) | |
| Vesting period | Three years. | ||
| Accrual period for IFRS 2 purposes | Four years | Three years | |
| Additional holding period. | A holding period of two additional
years will follow the vesting period of three years for the share
element. The SARs are subject to a four-year exercise period commencing on the vesting date and will be subject to a two-year holding period post vesting. |
||
| Performance conditions | No performance conditions apply, but performance is an entry qualification requirement. Further performance alignment via share price appreciation before the SARs will be exercisable. | Performance conditions apply to the grants. At the end of the three-year performance period, the performance conditions are tested and if met, awards are share-settled, vesting on a sliding scale between 50% at threshold and 100% at the upper target. | |
| Dividends | Dividends will accrue on the
shares
purchased by participants using their STI and these dividends must be taken in
the form of shares (provided the Company offers a scrip alternative), while the
shares are held in escrow to the end of the holding period. No dividends will accrue on the SARs during the exercise period. |
No dividends accrue on the CSP awards during the three-year performance period. | |
| Plan and individual limits | The DBW is non-dilutive to shareholders as it must be settled by purchasing shares on the market. |
The maximum number of new shares which can be issued to participants to settle obligations under the CSP is 7.4 million shares. The maximum number of shares which can be delivered to any individual participant in the CSP is 6.0 million shares. This limit will increase in the event of corporate actions such as special dividends which affect total shares in issue. |
|
| Deferred bonus warrants | Conditional share plan | ||
| Termination of employment provisions - “bad leaver” | If an executive director resigns from the Company or is terminated for fault, i.e. dismissal on grounds of misconduct, proven poor performance, dishonest or fraudulent conduct (“bad leaver”), all unvested LTI awards are forfeited. This includes DBW bonus shares (the employee's deferred STI element) and the co-investment from the Company awarded in the form of SARs within the three-year vesting period. In addition, such executives will be required to repay all dividends (pre-tax value) earned from the award date under the DBW. | ||
| Termination of employment provisions - “good leaver” | If termination is at the Company's instigation and not for fault (“good leaver”), the following will apply to the executive director / employee who is a participant in the LTI plans: | ||
| The participant will retain all the DBW Bonus Shares which have not yet vested because these were earned in a prior year and represent a part of a previous bonus which has been deferred. The participant will retain a portion of the DBW SARs which have not yet vested. The proportion will be determined pro rata, relative to the time of the vesting period which has elapsed up to the termination date. The terminated executive will continue to hold the reduced number of awards until the vesting date, when they will vest along with the other grants, in accordance with the rules of the scheme, if the relevant performance conditions are satisfied. | The participant will retain a portion of CSP awards which have been granted but have not yet vested. The proportion will be determined pro rata, relative to the time of the vesting period which has elapsed up to the termination date. The terminated executive will continue to hold the reduced number of awards until the vesting date, when they will vest along with the other grants, in accordance with the rules of the scheme, if the relevant performance conditions are satisfied. | ||
CSP performance condition
The committee has determined that a single performance condition relating to TSR is appropriate given the Group's strategic review which prioritises value creation/realisation as the overriding objective. The performance condition is that the absolute TSR must equal the Group's weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) as the threshold for 50% vesting. To achieve the target for 100% vesting the TSR must exceed the Group's WACC plus 2%. The calculation is done over the three-year performance with the WACC at the start of the period (and the 2% uplift) both being compounded to set the threshold and target. Between the threshold and target, linear interpolation will be used to establish the extent of vesting between 50% and 100%. There is no over-performance vesting if the target is exceeded.
Divisional long-term incentives
The Group's divisions operate share-based incentive schemes to incentivise management to generate value in the divisional entities.
All divisional incentive schemes are cash-settled and based on the notional value of the division, not Datatec shares.
- Westcon International
- In FY24, Westcon International implemented a management incentive plan termed the Westcon International Long-Term Incentive Plan (“WILTIP”) which is described below. In addition, a new SAR Scheme similar to the original SARs Scheme above was initiated for the next tier of senior management.
- Logicalis International
- In FY24, Logicalis International implemented a management incentive plan termed the Logicalis International Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LILTIP”) which is described below for the senior management team. The existing Logicalis International SAR Scheme for the next tier of senior management will continue.
- Logicalis Latin America
- Logicalis LATAM operates a CSP for senior management and a SAR Scheme for the next tier of senior managers. The feasibility of introducing an incentive plan for management appropriate for the local market is currently being investigated.
These schemes are accounted for under IFRS 2 Share-based payment (“IFRS 2”). Details of the operation of the subsidiary division share schemes, including grants, exercises and lapses during FY25 and the prior year, are included in Note 2 to the consolidated annual financial statements.
Management incentive plans implemented in subsidiaries: Logicalis International Long-Term Incentive Plan and Westcon International Long-Term Incentive Plan
Logicalis International implemented the LILTIP on 3 March 2023 following a corporate restructuring. An intermediate holding company called Logicalis International Group Holdings Limited (“LIGHL”) was inserted and is owned by Logicalis Group Limited (“LGL”). The Logicalis International senior management purchased 5.26% of the ordinary equity of LIGHL and LGL holds the remainder. A further 1.04% of the ordinary equity is available for purchase by management up to a total limit of 6.3%. A fixed return equity instrument (inter‑company loan note) was issued to Logicalis Group Limited in addition to its ordinary equity.
Westcon International implemented the WILTIP on 1 September 2023 following a corporate restructuring. An intermediate holding company called Westcon International Group Holdings Limited (“WIGHL”) was inserted and is owned by Westcon International Ltd (“WIL”). The Westcon International senior management purchased 5.0% of the ordinary equity of WIGHL and WIL holds the remaining 95%, with 1% earmarked for potential management participation in future. A fixed return equity instrument (inter‑company loan note) was also issued to WIL. Datatec continues to own a 92.1% shareholding in WIL with TD Synnex as the minority shareholder.
| US$ million | LIGHL | WIGHL | |
| Ordinary equity | 50 | 118.5 | |
| Fixed return instrument | 200 | 450 | |
| Total equity | 250 | 568.5 | |
During FY25, Mason Advisory also implemented a management incentive plan with a similar structure to the Westcon and Logicalis plans outlined above. The divisional management teams will only realise their investment at the same time as Datatec does through a value realisation event.
The executive directors of Datatec do not participate in any divisional schemes.
Exceptional incentive awards
In addition to the three elements of remuneration noted above (base salary, and short-term and long-term incentives), the Remuneration Committee may, in rare highly exceptional circumstances, award discretionary bonuses to management to recognise significant value creating transactions which generate exceptional value for shareholders. In such rare circumstances, any such awards would be preceded by consultation with major shareholders.
Shareholding guidelines
The Board has set out shareholding guidelines for executive directors whereby, in line with best practice, a shareholding with a market value of twice annual base salary should be held. The LTIs are intended to enable new executive directors to achieve this shareholding guideline over time. Both executive directors' shareholdings are compliant with this guidance at 28 February 2025 and at the date of this report.
Directors' service contracts
The employment contracts of executive directors are terminable at six months' notice by either party and contain contractual provisions for payment on termination covering the guaranteed package but no commitment relating to STI. The termination rules applicable to the LTIs are disclosed in the LTI section above.
All non-executive directors have letters of appointment with Datatec Limited. Under these contracts, non-executive directors retire in accordance with the Memorandum of Incorporation of the Company, which is at least every three years. Retiring directors may offer themselves for re-election.
Malus and clawback policy
The Board instituted a malus and clawback policy with effect from 1 March 2020, which was subsequently revised during FY23. The policy is based on a range of possible triggers, as follows:
- Material restatement of the Company's financial results caused by material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, including fraud, wilful negligence and misrepresentation;
- Errors in the calculation of STI or LTI;
- Material failure of risk management;
- Action or conduct of a participant which, in the reasonable opinion of the Board, amounts to serious misconduct or gross negligence; and
- Fraud, action or conduct of a participant which, in the reasonable opinion of the Board, amounts to serious dishonesty or breach of trust.
As the restatement of annual financial statements is a published event, the first trigger of the malus and clawback policy is well-defined and the process of clawing back STI and LTI, which had been based on the annual financial statements before restatement, will be transparent. Similarly, the calculation of STI and LTI is explained in this remuneration report annually so errors should be readily identified and would be transparently corrected under the policy.
The other triggers noted above account for eventualities other than those which cause a restatement of annual financial statements, which could inflict reputational damage on the Company. The committee believes it would be the Board's fiduciary responsibility to address such matters and incorporating them into the malus and clawback policy will facilitate appropriate measures to be taken in the event of the Company suffering reputational damage through the fault of executives.
Discretion
The remuneration policy set out in part 2 of the remuneration report sets out the methodology, metrics and principles, which will be used to determine the remuneration of Datatec directors and executives. It is not intended that there should be any departure from the policy in FY25.
However, the Remuneration Committee notes that exceptional circumstances can arise, which make it expedient for the committee to retain the ability to exercise discretion in responding to exceptional situations. It also notes that the STI is discretionary and the Board may exercise its fiduciary duty to override the outcome of the financial and personal metrics in exceptional circumstances of malfeasance by an executive – see clawback and malus policy above.
While the committee does not anticipate deviations from the policy, in FY25 it reserves the right to apply a discretion in exceptional circumstances and will report any such use transparently. Any material policy changes will only be made following shareholder consultation.
External appointments of executive directors
Subject to the approval of the Board, executive directors are permitted to hold a directorship in one non-Group listed company and to retain the fees payable from such an appointment.
Non-executive directors' remuneration
The fee structure for non-executive directors, including the Chair, is recommended to the Remuneration Committee by executive management. It is periodically reviewed, based on market benchmarking studies prepared by external advisers, using data from comparable companies and taking account of the international nature of the business.
Non-executive directors' fees are disclosed in the remuneration
implementation section of this report and are presented for
shareholder approval at the AGM.
Non-executive directors do
not participate in any Datatec share incentive plans.
The Chair's fee covers her role on the Board and its committees and attendance at subsidiary Board meetings and shareholder meetings as required. Other non-executive directors receive a fee for their Board role plus fees as members/chairs of individual committees.
The terms and conditions of appointment of non-executive directors are available on request from the Company Secretary.
Part 3 – Remuneration implementation
3.1 – FY25 Remuneration
Basic pay adjustments
The basic pay for the executive directors increased by 3% for FY25, as disclosed and explained in the FY24 remuneration report.
Short-term incentives
The FY25 STI bonus structure comprised Company and individual performance targets. The outcome is set out in the FY25 bonus outcome table.
The committee assessed achievement against the personal KPI goals as shown in the table below:
ESG – predominantly E-environment KPI (target 10%) – the committee reviewed the performance against the targets set out in the FY24 remuneration report, using feedback provided by the Responsible Business team as follows:
| Target per FY24 remuneration report | Achievement | ||
| Datatec net-zero tracking: Report year-on-year improvements or carbon reduction figures in the annual and integrated report, as required by Science-Based Targets Initiative (“SBTi”). | 2.0% | Data collection was complete and the expectation at the time the committee evaluated this metric was that the Group's Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions have reduced approximately 12% in FY25, therefore, this component was assessed as achieved. | 2.0% |
| UN Global Compact communication on progress: Publish the annual communication on progress report (CoP), demonstrating Datatec's commitment to sustainability in labour, human rights, the environment and anti-corruption. | 2.0% | The annual communication on progress report was published on 26 July 2024, therefore, this component was assessed as achieved. | 2.0% |
| EcoVadis: Improve the Datatec sustainability rating on EcoVadis, which evaluates the Group's environmental, social and ethical practices. | 2.0% | The 2024 EcoVadis score declined to 37 from
38 in the
prior year. An explanation provided to the committee showed mitigating circumstances but it was decided to assess this component as not achieved. |
0.0% |
| Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) Report: Perform a quantitative analysis of the financial impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on Datatec. The financial analysis will be a central pillar of future TCFD disclosures, enabling stakeholders to assess Datatec's climate-related resilience better. | 2.0% | A project had been undertaken with ERM (external consultants) to perform quantitative analysis of principal physical climate risks for disclosure in FY25 TCFD report. The final results had been reported on 16 May and, therefore, this component assessed as achieved. | 2.0% |
| EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) readiness: analyse and plan for the upcoming mandatory CSRD reporting requirements. This proactive approach will ensure Datatec is fully prepared to submit its first CSRD report in 2026, as mandated by the European Union. | 2.0% | Eligible Logicalis International and Westcon entities' deadline was delayed by two years by the EU; we are now due to report for the first time in FY29 on FY28 data. Both Logicalis International and Westcon undertook double materiality assessments in FY25 according to CSRD criteria, in preparation for the previous deadline and therefore this component was assessed as achieved. | 2.0% |
| ESG - total target | 10.0% | Achievement | 8.0% |
Reduce structural discount KPI (target 10%) – the committee reviewed the performance against the target set out in the FY24 remuneration report, being: initiatives to achieve value generation during FY25 to which the Remuneration Committee will apply a quantitative assessment when evaluating the level of achievement.
It was noted that, during the year, management undertook a number of initiatives aimed at value generation and widening awareness of Datatec and its investment case. These initiatives included: share repurchase programme, appointment of a new financial PR advisor to support external communication initiatives; and admission to the US OTC QX platform.
To assess the achievement quantitatively, the committee compared the TSR achieved in FY25 of 28.4% to a notional target of 20% and approved an achievement of 14.2% in relation to the weighting for this metric of 10% (28.4%achievement / 20.0% target x 10% weighting).
| Reduce structural discount - target | 10.0% | Achievement | 14.2% |
The total achievement of the personal KPI section was therefore 22.2% (target 20%)
| Personal KPIs - total target | 20.0% | Achievement | 22.2% |
FY25 bonus outcome
| 1) Underlying earnings per share | US cents | Bonus | Weighting | Outcome | ||
| Lower guard-rail | -12% | 23.0 | 40% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On target | Budget | 26.1 | 100% | 35.0% | 56.0% | |
| Upper guard-rail | 14% | 29.2 | 160% | |||
| Actual | 30.5 | 160% | ||||
| 2) Adjusted EBITDA | US$ million |
Bonus | Weighting | Outcome | ||
| Lower guard-rail | -14% | 200 | 40% | |||
| On target | Budget | 232 | 100% | 30.0% | 37.8% | |
| Actual | 246 | 125% | ||||
| Upper guard-rail | 14% | 265 | 160% | |||
| 3a) Westcon International working capital - net working capital days | Days | Bonus | Weighting | Outcome | ||
| Lower guard-rail | 10% | 16 | 40% | |||
| On target | Target | 14 | 100% | 5.0% | 8.0% | |
| Upper guard-rail | -10% | 13 | 160% | |||
| Actual | 4 | 160% | ||||
| 3b) Logicalis International working capital - operating cash conversion | US$ million |
Bonus | Weighting | Outcome | ||
| Lower guard-rail | -20% | 51.3 | 40% | |||
| Actual | 52.5 | 46% | 5.0% | 2.3% | ||
| On target | Target | 64.1 | 100% | |||
| Upper guard-rail | 20% | 76.9 | 160% | |||
| 3c) Logicalis LATAM working capital - operating cash conversion | US$ million |
Bonus | Weighting | Outcome | ||
| Lower guard-rail | -20% | (0.8) | 40% | |||
| On target | Target | (0.7) | 100% | 5.0% | 8.0% | |
| Upper guard-rail | 20% | (0.6) | 160% | |||
| Actual | 11.9 | 160% | ||||
| 4) Personal KPIs - CEO and CFO | Weighting | Outcome | ||||
| ESG | 10% | 20% | 22% | |||
| Reduce structural discount | 10% | |||||
| Total on-target bonus | 100% | 134.3% | ||||
The achievement of the targets set out above translated into the following bonus payment for FY25. The executive directors are required to defer a mandatory minimum of 20% of their FY25 bonus into the DBW (the final STI disclosed below includes the mandatory deferral percentage). See Deferred bonus warrants to be awarded during FY26 for details.
| Executive director | Base salary (A) |
On-target
bonus rate (B) |
Weighted corporate score (target 80%) (C) |
Weighted personal score (target20%) (D) |
Final STI (A x B x (C + D)) |
|
| Jens Montanana | 1 310 160 | 175% | 112.1% | 22.2% | 3 079 369 | |
| Ivan Dittrich | 578 654 | 95% | 112.1% | 22.2% | 738 313 | |
The targets and outcomes of the annual bonuses of the executive directors for FY25, shown as a percentage of base salary and split by the bonus elements, are illustrated below.
CEO FY25 bonus composition as a percentage of basic salary %
CFO FY25 bonus composition as a percentage of basic salary %
Datatec Group long-term incentives awarded during FY25
The annual grant of CSP awards was made on 18 June 2024 following approval by the Remuneration Committee. The awards will vest after three years subject to the Group meeting certain performance conditions set by the Remuneration Committee. One performance condition was applied to the FY25 award in line with the policy communicated in the FY24 remuneration report, namely:
| Performance condition | Threshold – 50% vesting | Maximum – 100% vesting | ||
|
The TSR growth will be calculated based on the Compound Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) according to the following formula:
Where:
|
TSR must exceed the Company's WACC over the three-year performance period. At 29 February 2024, the WACC was 11.1% per annum which is 37.1% compounded over the three-year performance period. | TSR must equal or exceed the Company's WACC +2% over the three-year performance period. This is 13.1% per annum which is 44.7% compounded over the three-year performance period. | ||
| Linear vesting applies between threshold and maximum levels. | ||||
Executive directors' CSP awards are as follows:
| Number of awards - movement in 2025 | Fair value of awards | |||||||||||
| CSP | Grant date | 29 February 2024 |
Granted | Vested | Lapsed | 28 February 2025 |
On grant US$'000 |
On grant as % of base pay |
On vesting US$'000 |
28 February 2025 US$'000 |
29 February 2024 US$'000 |
|
| JP Montanana | 1-Jun-21 | 834 034 | – | (834 034) | – | – | 1 094 | 91 | 1 733 | – | 1 764 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Jul-22 | 713 605 | – | – | – | 713 605 | 1 261 | 105 | 1 884 | 1 006 | |||
| 1-Jun-23 | 1 008 933 | – | – | – | 1 008 933 | 1 908 | 150 | 1 776 | 1 422 | |||
| 18-Jun-24 | – | 976 415 | – | – | 976 415 | 1 965 | 150 | 1 718 | – | |||
| 2 556 572 | 976 415 | (834 034) | – | 2 698 953 | 5 378 | 4 192 | ||||||
| IP Dittrich | 1-Jun-21 | 294 692 | – | (294 692) | – | – | 387 | 73 | 612 | – | 623 | |
| 1-Jul-22 | 252 142 | – | – | – | 252 142 | 446 | 84 | 666 | 355 | |||
| 1-Jun-23 | 356 490 | – | – | – | 356 490 | 674 | 120 | 627 | 503 | |||
| 18-Jun-24 | – | 344 999 | – | – | 344 999 | 694 | 120 | 607 | – | |||
| 903 324 | 344 999 | (294 692) | – | 953 631 | 1 900 | 1 481 | ||||||
The fair value of the CSP awards granted during FY25 at date of grant (18 June 2024) was R36.99 (FY24: R36.36) per award being the 30-day volume-weighted average share price on the day the Group's FY24 results announcement. The fair value at 28 February 2025 is based on the 30-day volume-weighted average share price on 28 February 2025, R49.40 (FY24: R40.56) multiplied by an estimate of the performance conditions being achieved. The 2021 awards vested in full in June 2024.
For the 2022 awards, the fair value at 29 February 2025 assumes that the awards will vest in full as the performance condition targets are expected to be achieved. For the 2023 and 2024 awards, the fair value assumes 67% vesting of the awards, i.e. that the performance condition targets will only be 67% achieved. The actual value of any benefit received by the directors from these CSPs will be reported in future remuneration reports when the awards vest.
Deferred bonus warrants awarded during FY25 based on FY24 STI outcomes
Executive directors deferred part of their FY24 bonuses under the terms of the DBW. The deferred part of the FY24 bonus was used to purchase Datatec shares “bonus shares” which will be held in escrow until vesting. In accordance with the policy, an equal co-investment from the Company was applied to the deferred bonus amount in the form of a grant of SARs whose expected value based on an actuarial calculation is equal to the STI deferred. The number of SARs awarded was determined by the Remuneration Committee based on an estimate of the fair value of the SARs at the date of grant in relation to the market value of a Datatec share.
Bonus shares purchased and the SARs granted in terms of the DBW plan are subject to an employment condition and only vest with the participant if they remain in employment with the Company for approximately three years to the vesting date on 30 June 2027. In addition, there is a two-year, post-vesting holding period which applies to the bonus shares and any shares arising from exercise of the SARs within two years of vesting.
| DBW |
FY25
grant |
Amount of bonus deferred |
Bonus shares purchased |
SARs granted |
Fair value of awards
on grant US$'000 |
||
| date | % | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | |||
| JP Montanana | 7-Jun-24 | 36.0 % | 1006 | 1006 | 1006 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP Dittrich | 7-Jun-24 | 20.0 % | 134 | 134 | 134 | 268 | |
| DBW | FY24 grant | Amount of bonus deferred |
Bonus shares purchased | SARs granted | Fair value
of awards on grant US$'000 |
||
| date | % | US$'000 | US$'000 | US$'000 | |||
| JP Montanana | 1-Jun-23 | 29.4 % | 473 | 473 | 473 | 946 | |
| IP Dittrich | 1-Jun-23 | 22.1 % | 85 | 85 | 85 | 170 | |
The number of shares to be purchased was calculated based on the Rand value of bonus deferred divided by R36.99 (FY24: R36.36) being the 30-day volume-weighted average share price on 27 May 2024, the date of the Group's FY24 results announcement. The bonus shares granted in terms of the DBW plan are subject to an employment condition and only vest with the participant if they remain in employment with the Company for approximately three years to the vesting date on 30 June 2027 during which time they are held in escrow accounts for each participant. These bonus shares are included in the directors' shareholdings shown in Note 30 to the financial statements.
Under the Rules of the DBW, dividends paid on the bonus shares during the vesting period must be taken as scrip distributions (if the Company provides a scrip alternative). The value of the scrip distribution received by the directors who are participants in the DBW during FY25 are as follows:
| Dividends on DBW bonus shares |
FY25 US$'000 |
FY24 US$'000 |
|
| JP Montanana | 128 | 63 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IP Dittrich | 21 | 12 |
SARs in respect of Datatec ordinary shares were granted in terms of the DBW plan on 7 June 2024 with a grant price of R36.99 (FY24: R36.36) per SAR being the 30-day volume-weighted average share price on 27 May 2024, the date of the Group's FY24 results announcement. The SARs granted to the directors were as follows:
| Number of awards - movement in 2025 | Fair value of awards | ||||||||||
| DBW SARs | Grant date |
Grant price ZAR |
29 February 2024 |
Granted | Vested | Lapsed | 28
February 2025 |
On grant US$'000 |
28 February 2025 US$'000 |
29 February 2024 US$'000 |
|
| JP Montanana | 15-Aug-22 | 27.75 | 1 411 860 | – | – | – | 1 411 860 | 624 | 1 633 | 943 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Jun-23 | 36.36 | 1 000 000 | – | – | – | 1 000 000 | 473 | 697 | 668 | ||
| 7-Jun-24 | 36.99 | – | 1 500 000 | – | – | 1 500 000 | 1 006 | 996 | – | ||
| 2 411 860 | 1 500 000 | – | – | 3 911 860 | 2 103 | 3 326 | 1 611 | ||||
| IP Dittrich | 15-Aug-22 | 27.75 | 279 701 | – | – | – | 279 701 | 124 | 324 | 187 | |
| 1-Jun-23 | 36.36 | 180 212 | – | – | – | 180 212 | 85 | 126 | 120 | ||
| 7-Jun-24 | 36.99 | – | 199 812 | – | – | 199 812 | 134 | 133 | – | ||
| 459 913 | 199 812 | – | – | 659 725 | 343 | 583 | 307 | ||||
Deferred bonus plan
The deferred bonus plan ("DBP") was discontinued in FY22 after executive directors
deferred part of their FY21 bonuses under the
terms of the DBP in June 2021.
In accordance with the policy, a co-investment
equal to the amount of deferred bonus was provided
by the Company and the total amount was applied to purchase Datatec shares in
accordance with the policy. During FY25, the DBP
awards from June 2021 vested at the end of the three-year employment period.
Single-figure remuneration of executive directors
During FY25, non-executive directors received the following fees:
| CEO | CFO | ||||||
| Component | FY25 US$’000 |
FY24 US$’000 |
FY25 US$’000 |
FY24 US$’000 |
|||
| LTI | CSP | 1 884 | 1 764 | 666 | 623 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBW SARs | 1 633 | — | 324 | — | |||
| Total LTI | 3 517 | 1 764 | 990 | 623 | |||
| STI | Cash | 3 079 | 1 790 | 738 | 536 | ||
| Deferred | — | 1 006 | — | 134 | |||
| Total STI | 3 079 | 2 796 | 738 | 670 | |||
| Pension | 214 | 214 | 87 | 84 | |||
| Benefits | 47 | 50 | 40 | 39 | |||
| Base salary | 1 310 | 1 272 | 579 | 562 | |||
| Guarantee package | 1 571 | 1 536 | 706 | 685 | |||
| 8 167 | 6 096 | 2 434 | 1 978 | ||||
LTI
CSP
The remuneration from the CSP shown for FY26 is the fair value of the award expected to vest because the performance conditions for the June 2022 CSP grant are expected to be met. Fair value is calculated using the 30-day vwap of Datatec shares as at 28 February in each year.
DBW
The value of the SARs granted by the Company in respect of FY25 and FY24 bonuses deferred by the directors is not included in the single-figure remuneration table. The intrinsic value of these SARs will be reported in the single-figure remuneration table for the financial year preceding their vesting. The intrinsic value of the SARs granted by the Company in respect of FY23 bonuses is included in the FY25 column above because these SARs will vest in FY26 (June 2025).
STI
The STI shown above is split between the element deferred into the DBW and the element paid in cash after publication of the Group results.
Non-executive executive directors' remuneration
During FY25, non-executive directors received the following fees:
These fees were approved by shareholders at the AGM on 31 July 2024. An increase of 3% is proposed for FY26 (the year ending 28 February 2026) and the proposed fees for FY26 will be submitted to the 2025 AGM for shareholder approval.
Non-executive directors are reimbursed for travel costs necessary for attending Board meetings and do not receive any employment benefits.
Benchmarking of non-executive directors' remuneration
During FY25, the remuneration committee commissioned Deloitte LLP to undertake an independent benchmarking exercise of non-executive directors' fees, using an international comparator group of technology sector companies. The review noted that the base fee for non-executive directors was positioned slightly below the median of this group. As committee fees were less common within the international comparative group, UK and South African comparators across all sectors were also used to provide broader reference points.
It was concluded that the committee fees were broadly aligned with median levels, except for Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee (ARCC) fees, which were above the median for audit committees in the comparator companies. The committee considered the higher ARCC fees to be appropriate given the level of responsibility involved, particularly due to the inclusion of risk within the ARCC's remit.
Summary of directors' remuneration
The remuneration of directors serving on the Board in FY25 and FY24 is shown in the following tables:
| 2025 | ||||||||
| Guaranteed package | ||||||||
| Basic salary US$’000 |
Pension US$’000 |
Other benefits* US$’000 |
Fees US$’000 |
STI US$’000 |
LTI US$’000 |
Total US$’000 |
||
| Executive directors | ||||||||
| JP Montanana | 1 310 | 214 | 47 | — | 3 079 | 3 517 | 8 167 | |
| IP Dittrich | 579 | 87 | 40 | — | 738 | 990 | 2 434 | |
| Total executive directors | 1 889 | 301 | 87 | — | 3 817 | 4 507 | 10 601 | |
| Non-executive directors | ||||||||
| SJ Davidson (retired 31 July 2024) | — | — | — | 42 | — | — | 42 | |
| S Everaet | — | — | — | 87 | — | — | 87 | |
| CR Jones (appointed 3 June 2024) | — | — | — | 68 | — | — | 68 | |
| M Makanjee | — | — | — | 245 | — | — | 245 | |
| CRK Medlock (retired 31 July 2024) | — | — | — | 38 | — | — | 38 | |
| MJN Njeke | — | — | — | 122 | — | — | 122 | |
| LC Rapparini ** | — | — | — | 188 | — | — | 188 | |
| DS Sita | — | — | — | 116 | — | — | 116 | |
| Total non-executive directors | — | — | — | 906 | — | — | 906 | |
| Total directors’ emoluments | 1 889 | 301 | 87 | 906 | 3 817 | 4 507 | 11 507 | |
| 2024 | ||||||||
| Guaranteed package | ||||||||
| Basic salary US$’000 |
Pension US$’000 |
Other benefits* US$’000 |
Fees US$’000 |
STI US$’000 |
LTI US$’000 |
Total US$’000 |
||
| Executive directors | ||||||||
| JP Montanana | 1 272 | 214 | 50 | — | 2 796 | 1 764 | 6 096 | |
| IP Dittrich | 562 | 84 | 39 | — | 670 | 623 | 1 978 | |
| Total executive directors | 1 834 | 298 | 89 | — | 3 466 | 2 387 | 8 074 | |
| Non-executive directors | ||||||||
| SJ Davidson | — | — | — | 101 | — | — | 101 | |
| S Everaet | — | — | — | 30 | — | — | 30 | |
| M Makanjee | — | — | — | 238 | — | — | 238 | |
| JF McCartney (retired 27 July 2023) | — | — | — | 32 | — | — | 32 | |
| CRK Medlock | — | — | — | 89 | — | — | 89 | |
| MJN Njeke | — | — | — | 121 | — | — | 121 | |
| LC Rapparini ** | — | — | — | 194 | — | — | 194 | |
| DS Sita | — | — | — | 103 | — | — | 103 | |
| Total non-executive directors | — | — | — | 908 | — | — | 908 | |
| Total directors’ emoluments | 1 834 | 298 | 89 | 908 | 3 466 | 2 387 | 8 982 | |
| * | Other benefits include private medical insurance, permanent health insurance, life assurance and fuel for private vehicle. |
| ** | Fees paid to LC Rapparini include: Datatec NED fees US$ 82 000 (FY24: $ 80 000) paid by the Company plus Logicalis LATAM ARCC Chair and Board committee fees US$ 106,000 (FY24: US$ 114 000) paid by Logicalis LATAM. |
Note: the non-executive directors' fees shown above exclude VAT.
3.2 – FY26 Remuneration
Basic pay adjustments
For FY26, the Remuneration Committee has approved an increase of 3% in the basic pay for the executive directors, noting that this increase is in line with the minimum awarded to Datatec head office staff. The increase is also in line with the US Consumer Prices Index (“CPI”) rate of inflation during FY25, which was 2.80%.
Non-executive directors’ fees
For FY26, an increase of 3% in non-executive directors’ fees and Board committee fees is proposed for shareholder approval at the AGM.
Short-term incentives
FY26 metrics:
The committee has adjusted the STI performance metrics following consultation with shareholders (see part 1 of this report).
Corporate financial goals: the same metrics as in prior years have been deployed in FY26, namely underlying earnings per share, Adjusted EBITDA and separate cash management/working capital targets metrics for each of Westcon International, Logicalis International and Logicalis Latin America reflecting the working capital metrics included in the STI of management of the three divisions. For FY26 these corporate financial goals constitute.
Personal goals (KPIs)for the executive directors for FY26 are as follows:
ESG – predominantly E – environmental to be assessed by achievement against the Responsible Business development timeline planned achievements for FY26:
- Datatec net-zero tracking: Report year-on-year improvements or carbon reduction figures in the annual and integrated report as required by Science-Based Targets Initiative (“SBTi”).
- Publish the first Datatec standalone Responsible Business report during FY26 (on FY25 performance)
Reduce structural discount – value generation during FY26 will be assessed by a quantitative mechanism correlating total shareholder return in the period with underlying earnings per share growth.
FY26 STI structure
| 1) Underlying earnings per share | US cents | Bonus | Weighting | |||
| Lower guard-rail | (12)% | 40% | ||||
| On target | Budget | 100% | 35% | |||
| Upper guard-rail | 12% | 160% | ||||
| 2) Adjusted EBITDA | US$ million | Bonus | Weighting | |||
| Lower guard-rail | (14)% | 40% | ||||
| On target | Budget | 100% | 25% | |||
| Upper guard-rail | 14% | 160% | ||||
| 3a) Westcon- average of four quarters'– net working capital days | Days | Bonus | Weighting | |||
| Lower guard-rail | 10% | 40% | ||||
| On target | Target | 100% | 5% | |||
| Upper guard-rail | (10)% | 160% | ||||
| 3b) Logicalis International working capital – operating cash conversion | US$ million | Bonus | Weighting | |||
| Lower guard-rail | (20)% | 40% | ||||
| On target | Target | 100% | 5% | |||
| Upper guard-rail | 20% | 160% | ||||
| 3c) Logicalis LATAM working capital – operating cash conversion | US$ million | Bonus | Weighting | |||
| Lower guard-rail | (20)% | 40% | ||||
| On target | Target | 100% | 5% | |||
| Upper guard-rail | 20% | 160% | ||||
| 4) Personal KPIs – CEO and CFO | ||||||
| ESG – predominantly E – environmental – 5% | 25% | |||||
| Reduce structural discount – 20% | ||||||
| Total on-target bonus | 100% | |||||
The FY26 targets for underlying EPS, Adjusted EBITDA and working capital metrics based on budget are not shown as this is commercially sensitive information but will be fully disclosed next year in the Implementation section of the FY25 remuneration report.
Long-term incentives
CSP planned award for FY26 - performance condition
The committee intends to apply a single performance condition to the June 2025 (FY26) CSP grant, being the absolute TSR performance condition (the same performance condition as FY25) using the Group’s WACC as the threshold:
| Condition | Conditional Share Plan | ||
| Performance period |
From the FY25 results announcement day being 27 May 2025 until the day of the FY28 results announcement approximately three years later. | ||
| Threshold (50% vesting) | 11.1% CAGR – the Group’s WACC | ||
| Maximum (100% vesting) | 13.1% CAGR – the WACC plus 2% |
Linear vesting applies between threshold and target levels. Potential outcomes for LTI in relation to base salary are illustrated in the scenario analysis below.
The committee considers a single performance condition to be appropriate given the Group’s strategic review which prioritises value creation/realisation as the overriding objective.
Deferred bonus warrants to be awarded during FY26 based on the FY25 STI outcomes
Executive directors have deferred part of their FY25 bonuses under the terms of the DBW. In accordance with the policy, an equal co-investment from the Company will be applied to the deferred bonus amount in the form of a grant of SARs whose expected value based on an actuarial calculation is equal to the STI deferred.
| Amount of bonus deferred | Bonus
shares purchased US$’000 |
SARs granted US$’000 | Fair value
of awards on grant date US$’000 |
||||
| DBW | FY25 grant date (expected) |
% | US$’000 | ||||
| JP Montanana | 1-Jun-25 | 21.1 % | 662 589 | 662 589 | 662 589 | 1 325 178 | |
| IP Dittrich | 1-Jun-25 | 20.0 % | 147 663 | 147 663 | 147 663 | 295 326 | |
The table above shows the monetary amount of the FY25 STI deferral to be used to purchase Datatec shares and Company co-investment in a grant of SARs made in June 2025. The fair value of the awards on grant includes both the shares purchased by directors with part of their FY25 bonus and the Company co-investment in the form of a grant of SARs.
Scenario analysis for FY26 remuneration
The following tables presents projected remuneration outcomes under four scenarios: minimum, threshold, on-target and maximum remuneration the executive directors can earn under the remuneration policy in the next financial year, FY26, compared to FY25.
CFO - FY26
US$'000
CFO - FY25
US$'000
Under the minimum scenario, the executives earn only their guaranteed package of base salary, benefits and Company pension contributions. All STI metrics are assumed to be below the lower guard-rail resulting in no STI payment and consequently no DBW deferral being possible. The CSP performance conditions are assumed to have not been met, resulting in no LTI value.
The threshold scenario includes the guaranteed package plus the minimum STI which would be earned if all STI metrics were triggered at the lower guard-rail threshold and 40% of on-target bonus was earned. It assumes that 20% of the bonus would be deferred into the DBW (despite investment in the DBW not being mandatory below the 50% bonus level) with the corporate co-investment applied. Under this scenario it is assumed that the CSP performance conditions are triggered three years after grant only at threshold level resulting in 50% vesting.
The on-target scenario assumes full achievement of STI targets with 20% of STI bonus mandatorily deferred into the DBW with the corporate co-investment applied, minimum deferral of 20% of STI into the DBW with the corporate co-investment applied. In addition the CSP vesting is assumed at 75% of target (half-way between the threshold and maximum scenarios).
The maximum scenario assumes STI performance exceeds the upper guard-rail resulting in the maximum STI being earned (which is 143% of the on-target STI for the CEO and 153% of the on-target STI for the CFO). This scenario also assumes the mandatory minimum deferral of 20% of STI into the DBW with the corporate co-investment applied. CSP awards are assumed to vest in full at 100% (as per plan design, there is no additional vesting beyond target).
The mandatory minimum deferral of 20% of STI into the DBW is assumed in
each scenario above (except the minimum scenario in which there is no STI).
If the maximum deferral of 50% of STI were to be made into the DBW, the
on-target scenario total for the CEO would increase by US$709 000 to
US$6 664 000 and the on-target scenario total for the CFO would increase
by US$170 000 to
US$2 123 000.
It should be noted that the CSP and DBW components of the scenario analysis will only become available to the executives three and five years respectively after the financial year shown in the analysis. Values in the scenario analysis reflect grant date share prices and are not discounted for time value of money.
Dilution attributable to Datatec Group share incentive plans
Datatec currently settles shares-based awards using shares purchased in the market and has no intention to issue new shares.
If new shares were to be issued to settle expected vesting of outstanding CSP awards, the dilution would be 2.50% (FY24: 2.38%). The DBW does not give rise to any dilution effect because forfeitable shares are granted to participants at the start of the holding period, using shares purchased in the market and the SARs co-investment, when ultimately exercised, will also use shares purchased in the market at the time.
Divisional share plans are entirely cash-settled and do not use Datatec shares, hence creating no dilution effect.
Shareholding guidelines
At the date of this report both executive directors are compliant with the shareholding guidelines set out in the policy section of this report.





